Home > gay marriage, misogyny > Marriage: the end point of misogyny!

Marriage: the end point of misogyny!

One may consider this topic as somewhat paradoxically the most negative selection among topics, but this again is another paradoxical statement. The more antipathetic one’s position is in regards to misogyny, the larger the number of misogynists and the greater variety of attitudes and behaviors who fall into one’s perception of “misogynist”. This is, of course, the subject of much controversy and debate with opinions ranging widely as to the extent and breadth of misogyny in society.

If an individual is a misogynist will he happen to marry a girl??

Probably no, possibly yes… misogynists stay single lifelong…. do they??

Some misogynists do marry due to the internal pressure from family or due to external pressure from the society. Otherwise he doesn’t unless a miracle happens. A man needs some sort of relation with the human kind… if he happens to be a misogynist then he might sometimes opt for the next gender that is available that is why gay marriages are still into existence.

Can marriage really bring misogyny to end??

Probably yes, possibly no… An individual becomes a misogynist due to certain incidents that he experienced in his life, which might have lingered in his mind for a long period. If a feminine uses her anatomies and happen to influence that ‘HE’ who belong to her; by showering affection, care, love and project herself in the perspective/isometric view (in a unique manner) and show that all women are not the same and there are few good pieces available in the real world market. If she is able to prove that, then ‘HE’ might change from misogynist-HE to normal-HE…

  1. Aishwarya Rao
    October 23, 2007 at 12:34 am | #1

    And your point being?

  2. Anonymous
    October 23, 2007 at 3:36 am | #2

    @ aishwarya rao:-

    the bottomline is, mr.virtualveeran’s article is “Scrambled and Erratic”

    DUMBASS!!!

  3. Raghuveeran
    October 23, 2007 at 5:05 am | #3

    @aishwarya rao
    puriyele na innoru-vaati padi….

    @anonymous
    signing yourself as a dumb ass…Wow!! thats gr8… you are so outspoken…which is of course appreciable nd healthy…

    but the statement what u said is obnoxious…

  4. Krishna
    October 23, 2007 at 6:32 am | #4

    @raghu
    Well U say the individual is misogynist. Irrespective of a woman showin the different views of her anatomy(body or brains… whatever) in different view he remains a misogynist because he is a misogynist. U cant change em(its too too hard). As far as gay marriages goes being a misogynist is not a pre-requisite. Gay marriages do not survive on misogynists.

    @Anon
    Scrambled and erratic for morons. U need some sense to unscramble it.

    @rao
    and ur point askin that ques?? No doubt anon supported u!

    The Devilzadvocate

  5. pipilikamarugondi
    October 23, 2007 at 6:58 am | #5

    comment

  6. rajath
    October 23, 2007 at 2:04 pm | #6

    yaen da scolding us?? is it a thappu to padichify ur blog???

  7. Raghuveeran
    October 24, 2007 at 1:49 am | #7

    @krishna
    1) I meant the brain nd heart…
    2) No baby it is possible…it has happened in real time…. (it might b too hard but it is not impossible).
    3) of course it is not the only reason for the gay marriages… there rrrrr mny reasons….

    @rajath
    I’ll try not to scold u in future posts…

  8. Anonymous
    October 28, 2007 at 4:44 am | #8

    oh fucker! the thing is, there s no point in reading your posts anymor. SUCKS BIG TIME MAN! JUST LIKE YOU AND YOUR DONG! SO DANGY-BABY, FUCK YOURSELF!

    dumbass—>yourself… u creep!!

  9. Raghuveeran
    October 30, 2007 at 4:29 am | #9

    @anonymous
    (:|
    get life…

  10. Anonymous
    October 30, 2007 at 4:46 am | #10

    get urself fucked!

  11. Raghuveeran
    October 30, 2007 at 5:03 am | #11

    @anonymous
    sod the strip out off! ma blog u monologue moron…

  12. Lapa
    November 1, 2007 at 10:00 am | #12

    MIGUEL TORGA

    THE PLOUGHMAN OF THE WRITING
    A SHARED PATH
    In the 1st centenary of his birth

    BY CRISTÓVÃO DE AGUIAR
    A SMALL GREAT BOOK

  13. Anonymous
    August 13, 2008 at 5:29 am | #13

    i completely agree that different anatomies of a woman can strongly storm a mysogynist perception, and that way marriage can be a end to misogyny. But i strongly oppose that gay marriages follow misogyny. they have different need than a normal person and try satisfying themselves anyway ending up into gay gay relationships.

  1. No trackbacks yet.